It has been a long journey for the subject Social Economic Studies. Ever since I first came in touch with it in Term 1, I have to admit that this journey was not a particularly smooth one. During the first few tutorials, the lessons were probably manageable for my part because the topics of discussion were issues I was already quite familiar with. Cultural Intelligence and its importance was a concept that I had already grasped. However, the first tutorial of SES has introduced me to a way to classify cultural intelligence, namely that four aspects of CQ- Drive, Knowledge, Action and Strategy. Therefore, SES was very manageable at that point of time.
In the second tutorial regarding Google, I could manage as well because we were studying something concrete. In other words, I was able to narrow down my research by a lot. This made it easier for me to do research. However, in the later tutorials, ranging from Confucianism to Western Ideologies to Social-Economic policies of China by Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, the research scope was admittedly to wide for my ability. I was thus unable to cover every aspect of the issue and was only able to come to class half-prepared. This snowballed into me being in a loss most of the time during the presenters' speech. Fortunately, I was able to follow after hearing other's comments, and I was at least able to contribute in class discussions. (On a side note, my knowledge of Japanese history has surprisingly helped, especially in the area of the policies implemented in China. I cross-referenced to Japan, although apparently it was a digression)
This brings me to my next point : assessment. Frankly speaking, I am not at all comfortable with the current assessment system. Although this might be a break from taking exams, I think that it has actually added more stress to us, rather than removing that stress. I say this because we are required to prepare for every lessons, so that we are able to discuss. Discussion in turn will affect 20% of the term grade. This is like taking tests every lesson! It adds a considerable amount of work to our already dangerously packed workload. In the event I did not prepare, I always taking lessons in trepidation of the scolding I was going to receive during the SES lesson - there, added stress levels.
There was improvement though, after the compromise of allocating one question to everyone was implemented. This considerably reduced our workload, which helped us a lot in relieving our work levels. As SES is still in its first year, perhaps this could continue for the years to come.
The research paper and term paper is a good part of the assessment. This is because it makes sure that students are not smoking through the module. In addition, it is a good alternative to the end-of-year exams. The reflective journals also are beneficial in the sense that it allows us to look back at the previous lessons and consolidate our thoughts.
Some difficulties I faced during the module was mostly my lack of time management. Somehow, because of my large pile of work and commitments and being unable to plan time properly, I was almost never able to research thoroughly. This really hindered my learning of the module.
In time to come, SES will definitely be applicable to my life (I hope). I am planning to study overseas in the future, and it is important for me to be able to adapt and understand different cultures. Although I most probably will not be going to China or America, what I have learnt in SES will definitely help in letting me understand how to deal with other cultures and practices. Whenever I get in touch with other cultures, I would also try to relate back to whatever I have learnt in SES. This module could also allow me to make new friends, create stronger ties et cetera. I can probably avoid many misunderstandings with this module.
All in all, SES is a very useful and interesting subject, and should continue for years to come.
(691 words)
Hi Akira,
ReplyDeleteI do agree with you that the main problem most of us faced is the lack of time to prepare for the module. Perhaps the reason might be because most of us feel that it is not worth it to spend so much time, which was around 3 to 4 hours at the start, reading through all the articles in order to prepare for the class as we could use this same amount of time to complete a lot of our homework from other subjects. However, if we chose not to prepare for class, we would be left out in the discussions as we are almost clueless about what is going on.
Additionally, I do agree with your point that studying SES will help you understand the different cultures better which will help you make friends in the future. However, I feel that due to globalisation, the perspectives of the new generation might be different from that of the previous one, hence, what we have learnt in SES might not be applicable at that point in time any more. However, other things that have benefited us is the oral presentation skills and sometimes a bit of critical thinking. All in all, I felt that it was a good reflection on the module and i do believe that the SES module would continue to improve.
Regards,
Jiun Wei
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey Akira,
ReplyDeleteI do not really quite agree with your points about preparation causing too much stress and that research is difficult. Firstly, about research. I do not think that we have had to do much research for the weekly preparations of each module. Readings were provided, from which most of the points raised during the class discussions were gotten from. Even though during the first few tutorials there were quite a lot of readings, however, just reading about three to four of them is enough to get the general idea of the topic, and extra research was not needed, so I do not get why you are writing a point about how much research has to be put in before each lesson. Perhaps you could clarify?
Next, about comparing preparation for each tutorial to weekly tests, I do not think it is so. As mentioned earlier, readings are already provided, and furthermore, the readings serve to provide information to us so that we know what will be going on in the lesson. Is it not a more efficient system if students read up on a topic on their own before attending the lesson to discuss their viewpoints rather than having one extra lesson for the teacher to teach the students about the topic content? It is not like the content is very difficult to understand and require a teacher to explain the concepts. Also, reading up beforehand promotes independence, and the readings do not take up much time, especially since they can be done during miscellaneous waiting time, such as at the waiting for the bus at the bus stop. Furthermore, there are usually two or more presenters to one topic, and even if one does not understand what is happening the first time, one should be able to grasp the general idea well enough to participate in the second discussion onwards, so I do not see what the problem is here. I think the point of reading up is to learn more about the topic, rather than to attain marks in the class discussion.
Regards,
Chong Kai En